Every
time I read something by Ian R McLeod I am reminded how much I enjoyed the last
thing of his that I read. Yet somehow he is not a writer whose work I remember
to actively seek out. I am not sure why this is except that he is what I would
term a ‘quiet’ writer. His novels and short stories are well-crafted but they
seem to be published without fanfare and are all too easily overlooked. On the
up side, there is at least the pleasure of rediscovery.
Wake
Up and Dream is McLeod’s sixth novel, his
first since Song of Time, which won the 2009 Arthur C Clarke Award. It
is set in Los Angeles in the 1930s, and features the ubiquitous down-at-heel
private eye. This one is called Clark Gable; inevitably,the name alerts the
reader to the fact that something is going on. My first thought was to sigh at
the use of such a tired old gimmick but it says a lot for McLeod’s ingenuity
and inventiveness that one quickly forgets about this; instead, the idea of
Clark Gable, failed film star and washed-up PI seems entirely plausible.
Indeed, one almost forgets that there is a world in which Clark Gable was a
successful film actor. How does McLeod accomplish this feat? First, he has a
very strong story, no matter the novelty of the PI’s name. Secondly, McLeod is
particularly skilful in the way he constructs the novel’s alternative
historical background. Thirdly, in terms of pacing, this is one of the most
tightly controlled novels I’ve read in a while.
To
start with the story: it is 1940, and Gable is contacted by one April Lamotte,
who wants him to carry out a particularly unusual job. She wants him to
impersonate her husband, a screenwriter, in order to facilitate the signing of
a contract. Daniel Lamotte is, according to April Lamotte, currently suffering
from a mental collapse and is sequestered in an highly exclusive nursing home.
She needs Gable, who looks not unlike her husband, to impersonate him for a few
hours, just to save the truth from coming out. Daniel Lamotte hasn’t had a really
big break since his successful ‘feelie’, The Virgin Queen, and there is
a lot riding on this contract. Lamotte has written the screenplay for a biopic
about Lars Bechmeier, the inventor of the technology behind the feelies, and everyone
seems to be very excited about it.
Bizarre
as the job seems to be, Gable agrees to take it on. The deception is
successfully carried out and in fairly short order April Lamotte attempts to
kill Gable b drugging him and leaving him in a car filled with carbon monoxide
fumes. However, something odd happens. Gable survives the attempt on his life
and forms the odd impression that something or someone unidentified saved him.
But who or what? His mind full of questions Gable returns to the city,
retreating to the room that Daniel Lamotte kept there so that he could get on
with writing in private.
Before
Gable can confront April Lamotte she is found dead in circumstances similar to
those Gable would have been found in, and Gable is himself mistaken for Daniel
Lamotte, forced to identify his ‘wife’ at the morgue and then maintain the
pretence. Gable turns this to his advantage in order to investigate April
Lamotte’s death and Daniel Lamotte’s disappearance. He works with a young
woman, Barbara Edsel, the real Daniel’s neighbour at the rooming house, who has
quickly realised that Gable is not who he claims to be. Gradually, they come to
realise that the Lamottes are part of a deeper conspiracy centred on something
called ‘Thrasis’. However, the question is, what is Thrasis? And there is a
second question: why have so many people associated with a film called Broken
Looking Glass, the first feelie, either vanished or else died in mysterious
circumstances? These include Betty Bechmeir, wife of Lars Bechmeir, the
inventer of the technology behind the feelies, found hanging from a bridge. These
are promising beginnings for a story and McLeod develops them from something personal,
something small-scale, into a complex story with national, even international,
ramifications, before resolving the story in a satisfyingly bitter-sweet way.
One
of the most admirable things about the novel is the way in which, as I said,
McLeod constructs the novel’s setting. As noted earlier, the novel is set in
1940. Europe is at war, and feeling is running high against FDR. There is a
great deal of anxiety about whether Roosevelt will take the USA into the war
and this anxiety has fuelled interest in the League of Liberty, an organisation
fronted by Herbet Kisberg, an openly anti-Semitic potential presidential
candidate. The League has, needless to say, a paramilitary wing, although
Kisberg keeps himself at some distance from it in public. Many people, though,
have simply joined the League as a means of expressing their disquiet.
But
McLeod doesn’t just employ a simple historical point of divergence. He
reinforces this with a technological point of divergence, the invention of the
Bechmeir field, a way of recording emotional responses and then broadcasting
them to manipulate people’s emotions. The obvious move was to incorporate them into movie production, hence
the advent of the feelies. Effectively, it’s like talking pictures all over
again. Many familiar movie stars fell by the wayside because, for various
reasons, they could not make the transition to the feelies. Gable was
particularly sensitive to the recording machines, reacting as badly to them as
they did to him, a fact that stands him in good stead as the story unfolds. We
see the Bechmeir Field at work in a number of situations, such as in the mental
hospital where Howard Hughes now occupies himself running the asylum’s heating
plant, and the broader implications of the technology are clear, given the
interest shown in it by the likes of Kisberg.
Too
often, alternate histories seem to foreground the points of divergence at the
expense of the story. Indeed, too often they’re not about the story at all
except insofar as it exists to show off their world-building chops. McLeod’s
presentation of the alternative technology is very understated; it is discussed
as and when the plot demands, rather than being drawn attention to as part of
some sort of Cook’s Tour of Alternate 1940. It is a necessary part of what is
going on but always subordinate to the story rather than being brought into the
spotlight to do a star turn. It prompts questions but not so obtrusively as to
distract the reader from the investigation. It’s a very low-key approach and
works very well to build the novel’s atmosphere. McLeod is good too on period
atmosphere, including just the right amount of detail as necessary, and not
dishing it out inappropriately just to show he’s done the research.
As
also noted earlier, I very much admired the pacing of this novel, the way
McLeod builds it up from the small beginning of Gable’s odd assignment, through
the death of April Lamotte to the realisation of Daniel Lamotte’s being
missing, connections being made painstakingly (no internet to rely on for
research, which means lots of scutwork in libraries – it really does seem to
make a difference to the way a story’s told), moving on to the realisation of
just how many people are implicated in what’s been happening. McLeod never
seems to drop the ball. He also seems to be able to use a first-person
viewpoint narrator with much more skill than many writers. There is no sense of
contrivance in making sure Gable is there to see what he needs to see. At the
same time, he doesn’t see everything or immediately make the connections and is
reassuringly fallible as a result.
In
short, I was rather impressed with this novel. It does a lot to refresh the
idea of the alternative history and the trope of the luckless PI. It’s just a
little bit knowing, enough to be fun without being gimmicky. It wears its
research lightly and its atmosphere is not overwhelming. And it tells a good
solid, very intriguing story. And the way things are going there is a lot to be
said for that.

No comments:
Post a Comment