I am
by no means up to date in my reading of China Miéville’s oeuvre, and that is
something I regret because I so liked Perdido Street Station and The
Scar when I read them. (I have also in the past read King Rat and Un
Lun Dun but they didn’t capture my attention in quite the same way.) So, in
approaching Embassytown it is a little like starting all over again.
First, there is the prose itself; there is something about
the way Miéville chooses words then employs them, with a sense of precision, every
word seeming to be set just so, as though the writer aspired to be a mosaicist.
Everything has weight and meaning, or at any rate everything seems to be
intended to have weight and meaning, which is not always quite the same thing.
This is a novel about language, or rather, a novel about
Language. Or perhaps it is intended to be a novel about language, or Language,
except that partway through it wanders away and transforms itself into a novel
about the consequences of language and the failure of Language before returning
to where it began.
The story is set far into the future on a distant planet which
has been colonised by humans; the main city is known to the humans as
Embassytown, which expresses its purpose unequivocally. It is home to the
Ariekei, a mysterious race most notable for the strangeness of their language,
which requires each speaker to have two mouths in order for it to be vocalised.
Many humans understand Language but only a few surgically altered and highly
trained Ambassador couples can speak directly to the Ariekei; even then it is
not always clear that communication is successful.
Added to that is the fact that the Ariekei cannot speak of
that which they do not directly experience. They only understand words with
sentience and intent behind them. They do not, for example, understand Language
generated by speech synthesisers. They have no symbolic language, no polysemy
(i.e. the capacity for signs, that is, words, to have multiple meanings).
Metaphor is unknown to them although they can construct and therefore
concretize similes (that is, make things for other things to be like, though
how they know what it is they want things to be like remains rather fuzzy. Critically,
they cannot lie or dissemble. They speak truth; one might even argue that they
manifest Truth.
The question is, as someone suggested to me earlier today,
whether this is a mangling of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, that is,
the idea that the structure of a
language affects the ways in which its speakers are able to conceptualize their
world, or whether Miéville is going after something else.[1]
On the basis of only one reading, this jury of one is out on that idea, not
least because I don’t think it engages fully with the idea of how language
might come about in the first place. [2]
While keeping in mind the unique properties of
Language, as they are important to what happens later, there are other aspects
of this novel which I’d like to consider, not least Embassytown itself, and its
position so far from anywhere else. It is a colony – somewhere out in the
immer, there is a place called Bremen, which seems to have responsibility for
Embassytown and the planet. Miabs – unmanned cargo ships – arrive from time to
time, and so do manned vessels but contact with the world outside is fragile.
The humans are heavily reliant on the Ariekei and the extraordinary flora and
fauna of the planet, which contribute to their technological needs. The animate
and inanimate blend unexpectedly; it’s a persistent theme in Miéville’s work, and
here it produces some extraordinary low-key world-building. Embassytown and its
environs are not flashy and hi-tech but they are consistently unfamiliar to the
reader, although we of course see them through the matter-of-fact eyes of
someone who grew up on the planet, which makes the whole thing all the
stranger.
I like too Miéville’s concept of space, immer.
Again, it might have been glossy, as we’re used to seeing on screen, but there
is a flavour about immer that is more reminiscent of old-style navigation on
sailing ships, a perception of space being filled with reefs and shoals, swirls
and eddies, unchartable vastnesses, and a sense that someone has been here
before because there are lighthouses, warning the voyagers. Avice Bener Cho’s
struggle to explain immer is instructive; she too is stripped of language when
it comes to describing her experiences beyond the planet.
Yet, quick as she was to leave, Avice comes home,
bringing with her Scile, her husband, a linguist fascinated by the thought of
the Ariekei, the Hosts as they are also known. For him, the unique nature of
the Ariekei is the lure; Avice is less certain as to why she has returned,
other than to please Scile. It is an unspoken rule that those who leave
Embassytown and it is a small place do not return, indeed do not want to return
once they’ve seen the breadth of the world beyond. There is almost a sense of
embarrassment about her having come back, as though she has in some way failed.
But outside eyes are necessary for considering
what is to come. For me, one of the most interesting things is Miéville’s
portrayal of the colony of Embassytown and its relationship with the Ariekei,
the Hosts, as well as its relationship with
the outside. One might linger on the use of that word ‘Hosts’, with its
implication of invitation and welcome. There seems to be no foundational myth
about the settling of Embassytown, though we hear a little of how they
struggled to understand the Ariekei and to communicate with them. The Ariekei
move through the novel, strange presences (how to visualise them? I end up thinking
of praying mantises, especially when the Ariekei unfurl their fan- and
giftwings) exotic to the humans, unknowable.
At this point it is perhaps helpful to turn back
to Scile, attempting to study the Ariekei. Scile is excited in a way that
perhaps only a researcher can be, determined to understand every nuance of what
is happening, but significantly, a researcher who finds that his subject is
changing. We might see his dismay more conventionally couched in terms of
anthropologists disturbed to find that the culture of the people they are
studying is becoming ‘contaminated’ by encounters with the outside world, but
Scile’s response is conventional enough, to determine to preserve the Ariekei
and Language, despite what they might want.
And certainly some Ariekei want change; they
want, for example, to be able to lie. They are trying to train themselves to
lie although they find this literally almost physically impossible to do. Their
purpose in wanting to do this remains not entirely clear but there is no reason
why it should be obvious. Perhaps they will feel more able to communicate with
the humans if they can do so within a framework familiar to humans. Either way
one should focus more on Scile’s arrogance in daring to deny the Ariekei the
choice to do what they will with Language. In fact, as becomes clear later, the
relationship between the humans, Ariekei and Language is more complex than
anyone could have imagined, in that used in a certain way spoken Language is addictive,
and many of the Ariekei are in fact hooked on the slightly stilted renditions of
Language delivered by the Ambassadors, who are not the facilitators they might
have imagined.
And it is here that the novel is no longer about
Language but about the consequences of language as the arrival of a new
unmatched Ambassador, EzRa, precipitates a crisis among the Ariekei because of
the way he speaks. It is perhaps the most unlikely cause of a revolution and
this is the most unlikely of revolutions. Indeed, for much of this portion of
the novel it is difficult to understand that a revolution is taking place.
Instead, Miéville presents an extraordinary and sustained picture of a
microcosmic society on the verge of collapse, brought to a standstill by
addiction and by the power of words. Sad, elegaic, terrible and most of all
melancholic, this portrayal of the end times of Embassytown is extraordinarily
vivid. One is so swiftly caught up in it it is all too easy to lose sight of
how one reached this point.
Only latterly does the story suddenly, almost
wrenchingly, return to the issue of Language. Losing Language, losing culture
if you like, is the key to surviving the addiction for the Ariekei, something
many of them have figured out already. There are some tempting postcolonial
interpretations waiting to be placed on this situation, not least because in
the middle of everything it is revealed that Bremen has suspected for some time
that Embassytown, that is the humans of Embassytown, were going to make a bid
for independence and was plotting to hang on to the colony because of its
position on the edge of known space. It’s not difficult, for example, to think
of the Embassytown humans, people like Avice who have initiated the destroying
of Language, as complicit in transforming the Ariekei into citizens of this
little empire, given the recognition of the need for the Ariekei to learn
Anglo-Ubiq (a name which itself says it all). I could go on but my Truth is
that this novel needs more than one reading to fully appreciate what is
happening in theoretical and philosphical terms, but at present one reading
must suffice.
At the end of it all, however, I am not certain
how successful a novel this is. It raises fascinating issues, it is amazingly
atmospheric, the world is vividly painted, and yet, and yet, something is
lacking. I don’t quite know what it is but in some mysterious way this novel
has failed to communicate its Truth to me, perhaps because it is not entirely
certain itself what its Truth actually is. I like it a good deal but there is
something unfinished about it, rather like some of the stranger creatures that
fill its pages. It lies in shadow, not fully realised on the page, perhaps
because it cannot ever be.
[1] I am indebted to Ian
Sales and Paul C Smith for a fascinating discussion about this on Twitter.
[2] For more on the
philosophical dimensions of Embassytown, I would suggest reading Adam
Roberts’ excellent discussion at Strange
Horizons
I must admit I wasn't so keen on Miéville's neologisms. Immer and manchmal struck me as overly-clever, and miab (message in a bottle) as silly. Not to mention his decision to "reinvent" AI...
ReplyDelete